| | | 
Forum Member
       
Group: Forum Members Last Login: 5/27/2005 1:56:00 PM Posts: 103, Visits: 1 |
| Retail Pro BTF-Series 8.4/8.5/Tools Update Release Cycle
RPro v8.51 Core | Updated executables Contained in the October RPro v8.51 Core update: | Core Files: | rpro8.exe, ms_ie_d5.bpl, RPRO_API.bpl, rda2.dll, vcl50.bpl, vclie50.bpl, PPMSERVR.exe, RTICheck.dll, RTICredit.dll, RTIGift.dll, RTIDebit.dll, RtiShift4Credit.dll, RtiShift4Debit.dll, RtiShift4Check.dll, RtiShift4Gift.dll, Batch.exe, mprocin.exe, rprocin.exe, cprocin.exe | Tools: | xz.exe | | Issue ID: | 14370 | WebTAC ID: | 27754 | Area: | Receipts | Severity: | 2 - Serious | Title: | Edit quantity in F5 window switches to last item on a receipt | Description: | On a receipt, the F5 edit window was displaying the last item on the receipt, rather than the one that was selected in some cases. | Resolution: | Pressing F5 will now allow edits to the item selected. |
Issue ID: | 14318 | WebTAC ID: | 27208 | Area: | Receipts | Severity: | 4 - Low | Title: | Receipts - Cashier drop down list in receipts does not index when using Korean characters | Description: | The cashier drop down menu does not index when using Korean characters (double byte characters). So when you select the cashier window and type in a character it does not sort on the first character. | Resolution: | With the addition of a new system preference called 'Allow free-type for employee names' checked, it is now possible to type a character in the Cashier field on a receipt, and then Rpro8 will automatically find the next best match when the focus leaves the field. Additionally, if you drop down the list it should automatically synchronize whatever you typed in so far with the best match in the list. |
Issue ID: | 14176 | WebTAC ID: | 25952 | Area: | Purchase Orders | Severity: | 5 - Change Request | Title: | Request for P$T$ total on Pending Po's | Description: | Request to allow Proposed Po's to have a total with P$T$. Currently there is a Total field on the proposed PO, this field totals all the P$'s from all the items. If using VAT there is not a way to Total P$T$. | Resolution: | This field has been added to the document level so that it is available on Pending PO's, Pending Vouchers, and also Voucher and POs. In addition, the PO Price field has been added to Vouchers. |
Issue ID: | 13992 | WebTAC ID: | 24635 | Area: | Sales Orders | Severity: | 2 - Serious | Title: | Minimum required deposit not suggested in sales orders when sale is recorded before first deposit. | Description: | When permissions were set to both require 10% deposit and record sale before deposit, the deposit requested was 100% instead of the percentage indicated. | Resolution: | The error was caused by RPro counting both the deposits used and the deposits taking transactions when calculating deposit minimum. RPro8 now counts only the number of deposit-taking transactions when determining if a deposit minimum is needed. | | | | | Issue ID: | 14604 | WebTAC ID: | | Area: | Receipts | Severity: | 3 - Moderate | Title: | Multiple items found dialog sorts by UPC incorrectly | Description: | RPRO incorrectly sorts by UPCs if those UPCs have different number of digits, or if one starts with zero while another one does not. For example, normally while sorting you would put 02323456789 in front of 123023456789, but Rpro was actually sorting them reversing the order (because it was not taking into account leading zero). | Resolution: | The leading zero will now be taken into account when sorting by UPC. |
Issue ID: | 14592 | WebTAC ID: | | Area: | Receipts | Severity: | 1 - Critical | Title: | Receipts are filed in the wrong month if user is in POS when the month changes on the system | Description: | If the user is in the POS module when the month changes in the system (i.e. at midnight at the end of the month), any receipts created after that are filed in the wrong month until the user goes all the way out to the Main screen of RPro. | Resolution: | History documents (receipt, voucher, memo) are now correctly filed when when the month changes in the system (i.e. at midnight at the end of the month) without user having to goes all the way out to the Main screen of RPro. |
Issue ID: | 14583 | WebTAC ID: | | Area: | RDA2 | Severity: | 3 - Moderate | Title: | TaxRate2 not being set correctly through TTaxRate | Description: | With Multi-Tax enabled, TTaxRate is called twice for each item. Once for the first TaxArea and then again for the second TaxArea. I am able to set the tax rate for the first tax area but when I set the rate for the second tax area, the rate I am setting does not get set in the document. | Resolution: | Tax rate 2 was not being calculated correctly using the TTaxRate plugin. The Taxrate 2 was assigned to the wrong variable. That has been corrected |
Issue ID: | 13820 | WebTAC ID: | 23462, 26124 | Area: | Sales Orders | Severity: | 3 - Moderate | Title: | SO Balance due is ($0.01) after making a full deposit on the SO | Description: | After making a full deposit on an SO, the Balance Due value is incorrect. | Resolution: | A 0.5 cent discrepancy was created when using a SO deposit on a receipt because RPro was comparing a non-rounded total to a rounded deposit balance. This issue has been corrected. |
Issue ID: | 14371 | WebTAC ID: | 27768 | Area: | Sales Orders | Severity: | 2 - Serious | Title: | Sales Orders are incorrectly updating the serial number table during polling. | Description: | When making a Sales Receipt, where we refer to a SO - layaway (loan), the serial numbers will after the polling have a status as “ SO - reserved” at the serial number table. The serial number should be removed from the table. | Resolution: | Instead of being marked as reserved, serial numbers are removed after polling in this case. |
Issue ID: | 14499 | WebTAC ID: | 28609 | Area: | Inventory | Severity: | 2 - Serious | Title: | Auxillary Fields moves up one entry from Selection | Description: | The options set for auxillary fields in preferences were not being adhered to in RPRO when users made a selection. For instance, if the options were: 6 12 15 18 If the user chose 15, the program would chose 18. It always chose the option directly below the one that the user chose. | Resolution: | The selection made by the user was stored. |
Issue ID: | 14177 | WebTAC ID: | 25756 | Area: | EFT - General | Severity: | 3 - Moderate | Title: | Request for Batch.exe, ability to print a detailed report after upload. | Description: | Request for Batch.exe, ability to print a detailed report after batch upload. Currently prints summary and does not obey setting in preferences (to select detailed or summary). Prints a detailed report fine when printing manually, the condition here is only for after performing an upload. | Resolution: | The preview screen and printing in the upload screen now checks the setting in Preferences > Print batch reports as. When you enter the upload screen, if the setting is prompt, then you're prompted for detailed or summarized. If you select cancel in the prompt window, then it defaults to detailed. The preview and the report that's generated after the upload both will display according to the pref setting. |
Issue ID: | 14030 | WebTAC ID: | 24858 | Area: | Polling | Severity: | 2 - Serious | Title: | Cannot edit a voucher at the backroom then update manually through pending vouchers. | Description: | If you edit a voucher at the backroom when you poll the voucher to the main it will not let you update the voucher, giving you an error that this voucher already exists. | Resolution: | A change has been change so that if a edit occurs with the same number of items the pending voucher allows the update. |
Issue ID: | 14584 | WebTAC ID: | | Area: | EFT - Shift4 | Severity: | 2 - Serious | Title: | Activating a gift card through Datamark sends the amount to Shift4 in the wrong field | Description: | When activating a gift card, we first do a balance inquiry to see if it needs to be activated or re-activated. In the case where the store is using Datamark as the gift card processor, the balance inquiry always shows the card as previously activated, but with a zero balance. This causes Rpro to send an add value transaction instead of an activation, however, an add value transaction transmits the amount in a field called PrimaryAmount. Shift4 wants to see the amount in the IYCBalance field. | Resolution: | We now fully support Datamark cards. |
Issue ID: | 14560 | WebTAC ID: | | Area: | EFT - Shift4 | Severity: | 5 - Change Request | Title: | RtiShift4Gift.dll requires exp date to return valid response from Shift4 | Description: | RTIshift4gift.dll requires that there be an EXP date. Swiping one of these cards results in an error from the shift4 website | Resolution: | Changes were made to support swiping cards with track 2 data in this format that doesn't include expiration date information. Shift4 no longer is requiring an expiration date on these types of cards. Issed was tested with Datamark cards, because they follow the exact same format as Card Mart. |
Issue ID: | 14551 | WebTAC ID: | |
|
| |
|